Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 n’a pas eu le droit qu’à une version Pro une déclinaison 5G a également rejoint le catalogue du constructeur chinois, avec quelques évolutions notables testées par la rédaction. Source Frandroid Parmi la pléthore de téléphones Xiaomi annoncés et lancés en mars 2021, le Redmi Note 10 a fait l’effet d’une petite bombe dans le segment de l’entrée de gamme. Le fabricant a également voulu se mettre à la page de la 5G en proposant une déclinaison dédiée sobrement baptisée Redmi Note 10 5G. Pour l’occasion, ce dernier embarque un processeur non plus fourni par Qualcomm, mais par MediaTek. Le quadruple capteur photo se transforme aussi en un triple objectif, et l’écran anciennement rafraîchi à 60 Hz opte pour une fréquence de 90 Hz. Autant de petits changements testés par la rédaction. À noter que pour ce test, nous ne nous étalerons pas sur l’interface logicielle du téléphone, vu et revu au cours des derniers mois. Je vous invite à consulter les tests des Redmi Note 10, Redmi Note 10 Pro, Xiaomi Mi 11, Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra ou encore Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite. Avec, vous devriez être rassasiés. Fiche technique Modèle Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G Version de l'OS Android 11 Interface constructeur MIUI Taille d'écran pouces Définition 2400 x 1080 pixels Densité de pixels 405 ppp SoC Dimensity 700 Puce Graphique GPU other Mémoire vive RAM 4 Go Mémoire interne flash 128 Go, 64 Go Appareil photo dorsal Capteur 1 48 MpxCapteur 2 2 MpxCapteur 3 2 Mpx Appareil photo frontal 8 Mpx Enregistrement vidéo 1080p Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 ac Bluetooth Bandes supportées 2100 MHz B1, 800 MHz B20, 1800 MHz B3, 2600 MHz B7, 700 MHz B28 5G Oui NFC Oui Capteur d'empreintes Oui Ports entrées/sorties USB Type-C Batterie 5000 mAh Dimensions n/a Prix 169 € Fiche produit Ce test a été réalisé à partir d’un téléphone prêté par la marque. Design La formule esthétique appliquée aux Redmi Note 10 4G et Redmi Note 10 5G est globalement la même, à une ou deux petites différences près les dimensions et le module photo. En effet, la version 5G prend un peu d’embonpoint avec 190 grammes sur la balance, contre 178,8 grammes pour son homologue 4G. L’épaisseur monte aussi d’un cran 8,92 mm contre 8,3 mm, au même titre que la hauteur 161,81 mm contre 160,5 mm et la largeur 75,34 mm contre 74,5 mm. En pratique, avoir un téléphone légèrement plus lourd et plus épais impacte la prise en main. Source Frandroid Ne vous inquiétez pas bien que moins bonne, celle du Redmi Note 10 5G reste tout à fait correcte. Mais c’est tout de même un élément et une petite concession à prendre en compte si vous souhaitez profiter de la 5G à bas prix. Autre évolution stylistique observée l’arrière du téléphone, et plus précisément le module photo. Le Redmi Note 10 5G se délaisse d’un capteur le triple objectif est ainsi placé de manière totalement verticale, dans un module rectangulaire qui semble légèrement moins grand. Source Frandroid Pour le reste, rien ne bouge boutons de volume et de mise en veille avec capteur d’empreintes digitales dessous sur la tranche droite, poinçon central à l’avant, bordures relativement épaisses, prise jack sur la tranche supérieure, emplacement double SIM et carte microSD sur la tranche gauche et verre Gorilla Glass 3. À noter que le modèle envoyé coloris Gris graphite a tendance à beaucoup attraper les traces de doigt, et qu’aucune certification contre l’eau et la poussière n’est au menu, ni de haut-parleurs stéréo. C’est dommage la version 4G en possédait une IP53 accompagnée d’un double haut-parleur. Écran Forcément, la déception est de mise lorsque l’on découvre les caractéristiques du Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Pourquoi ? Car la technologie OLED présente sur le Redmi Note 10 4G, le Redmi Note 10 Pro et le Redmi Note 10 s est ici remplacée par du LCD. Or, c’était l’une des principales forces de ces téléphones proposer de l’OLED à un si petit prix. Ici, la marque chinoise fait donc marche arrière et se contente donc d’une dalle LCD de 6,5 pouces. Cette taille de diagonale se situe ainsi à mi-chemin entre le Redmi Note 10 6,43 pouces et le Redmi Note 10 Pro 6,67 pouces. Elle profite par ailleurs d’une définition Full HD+ 2400 x 1080 pixels, mais aussi et surtout d’un taux de rafraîchissement de 90 Hz adaptatif. Source Frandroid Là encore, cette fréquence vient s’intercaler entre celles de la version classique et Pro. Comparé à du 60 Hz, elle a pour avantage d’apporter une meilleure fluidité et un meilleur confort visuel, mais consomme en contrepartie plus d’énergie. Il n’empêche, il est toujours agréable de naviguer avec du 90 Hz sur un téléphone sous les 300 euros. Calibrage En mode saturé, la température de l’écran atteint les 7646 K il tire donc un peu trop vers le bleu. Vous pouvez l’équilibrer avec une palette manuelle ou le mode auto qui permet d’ajuster les couleurs selon l’éclairage ambiant. Notre sonde et le logiciel CalMAN de Portrait Displays ont aussi calculé une luminosité maximale de 488 cd/m2. Pour du LCD, ce score se situe dans la bonne moyenne. Vous pouvez aussi compter sur un contraste de 15011, ce qui est là aussi très bien. Aucun problème enfin pour visionner des contenus HD sur les plateformes SVOD grâce à la compatibilité Widevine L1. Aucun problème non plus pour déverrouiller votre écran le capteur répond bien présent. Photo Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G arbore un triple capteur photo contre un quadruple sur le Redmi Note 10 4G à l’arrière, dont la voici la configuration Caméra principale de 48 mégapixels f/1,79 ; Capteur macro de 2 mégapixels f/2,4 ; Capteur de profondeur 2 mégapixels f/2,4. Ce modèle fait l’impasse sur le capteur ultra grand-angle, et promet donc une moins bonne polyvalence photographique. Le capteur principal, macro et de profondeur bénéficient d’un nombre de pixels et d’une ouverture focale identiques comparés à la version 4G. Source Frandroid Un capteur principal capricieux Au premier coup d’œil, le Redmi Note 10 5G souffre d’un défaut récurrent une gestion de la dynamique moyenne qui entraîne une sous-exposition ambiante pas forcément avantageuse. Certes, les conditions météorologiques et lumineuses n’étaient pas optimales, mais certaines zones n’étaient pour autant pas plongées dans une si profonde obscurité. Comparé à la version 4G, le niveau de piqué baisse lui aussi de régime, alors que le traitement colorimétrique ne met que très rarement les scènes en valeur. Elles paraissaient d’ailleurs tristounettes à certains moments. La mauvaise dynamique peut aussi jouer un rôle dans cette observation. Bref, ce capteur principal a l’air d’être moins séduisant que celui de son homologue 4G. Cette différence s’explique par la présence d’un processeur différent, qui ne traite pas de la même manière les images. De nuit, pas de grands miracles En environnement nocturne, le téléphone fait avec les moyens du bord et délivre des photos moyennes où un bruit numérique se fait souvent sentir. La mauvaise gestion des sources lumineuses entraîne également l’apparition de halos lumineux et d’effets lens flare. De son côté, le mode nuit parvient à peine à déboucher les zones plongées dans l’obscurité. Avec, la photo a aussi l’air d’être plus floue. Bref, à éviter. Mode 48 mégapixels aucune différence Difficile de percevoir un véritable gap de netteté et de niveau de détails entre une photo classique et une autre prise avec le mode 48 mégapixels. La seule petite observation se situe au niveau de l’exposition, qui paraît un poil plus pousser avec la photo 48 mégapixels. En somme, ce mode s’avère tout bonnement inutile. Le mode macro à la ramasse Pas de miracle avec le capteur macro, dont la pertinence ne peut être que remise une nouvelle fois en question au regard des clichés obtenus. Un mode portrait correct, mais perfectible En mode portrait, quelques petites imperfections sont facilement observables au niveau des cheveux, de la main appartenant à mon collègue ou des antennes du bugdroid. Du classique à ce prix-là le Redmi Note 10 4G ne faisait d’ailleurs pas mieux. Des selfies qui devraient satisfaire En selfie, le mode portrait n’apprécie clairement pas les contre-jours en l’absence de HDR photo n° 1. Évitez donc ce type de configuration, et privilégiez des scènes plus faciles à gérer pour le téléphone. Sur le second exemple, l’appareil applique un effet bokeh à de nombreuses mèches de cheveux alors qu’il ne devrait pas. À l’avant, la caméra avant de 8 mégapixels offre des selfies relativement corrects répondant aux exigences d’un téléphone de sa gamme tarifaire. Pour la vidéo, le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G reste limité à 1080p en 30 FPS. Performances L’une des grandes différences qui distinguent les Redmi Note 10 5G et 4G est la nature de leur processeur Mediatek Dimensity 700 pour le téléphone actuellement testé, contre un Qualcomm Snadragon 678 pour le second. Il nous a été en revanche compliqué de comparer leurs scores benchmarks, puisque des bugs inexpliqués nous ont empêchés de soumettre le téléphone aux différents protocoles. Xiaomi nous a par la suite confirmé que le téléphone n’avait pas été correctement flashé avant de nous l’envoyer. Benchmarks Seuls PCMark et Androbench ont fonctionné pour nous fournir un résultat. Le premier se concentre notamment sur les performances du processeur en simulant une utilisation assez active. Résultat le Dimensity 700 fait mieux que le Snapdragon 678 du Redmi Note 10 4G. Modèle Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Realme 7i AnTuTu CPU N/C 95513 97184 74958 AnTuTu GPU N/C 30651 77455 43366 AnTuTu MEM N/C 47396 53584 42079 AnTuTu UX N/C 49352 61373 42009 PC Mark 8870 7036 7187 8889 3DMark Slingshot Extreme N/C 1441 N/C 1389 3DMark Slingshot Extreme Graphics N/C 1250 N/C 1125 3DMark Slingshot Extreme Physics N/C 3100 N/C 2616 3DMark Wild Life N/C 480 N/C 700 3DMark Wild Life framerate moyen N/C FPS N/C FPS GFXBench Aztec Vulkan/Metal high onscreen / offscreen N/C / FPS N/C / FPS GFXBench Car Chase onscreen / offscreen N/C / FPS N/C 17 / FPS GFXBench Manhattan onscreen / offscreen N/C 21 / 25 FPS N/C 43 / 25 FPS Lecture / écriture séquentielle 834 / 394 Mo/s 497 / 221 Mo/s 510 / 272 Mo/s 314 / 184 Mo/s Lecture / écriture aléatoire 39145 / 40256 IOPS 32408 / 29427 IOPS 36348 / 34264 IOPS 21362 / 22070 IOPS AnTuTu 8 N/C 222912 289596 202412 Voir plus de benchmarks Ne croyez tout de même pas vous amuser sur Fortnite, car malgré cette plus grande puissance sur le papier, le téléphone est incapable de lancer le jeu d’Epic Games. L’application nous indique que l’appareil mobile est incompatible avec le titre, faute de performances suffisantes. Le Redmi Note 10 4G, lui, parvenait tout de même à le télécharger et le lancer. En clair privilégiez des jeux peu gourmands. Sinon, pour le quotidien, le Redmi Note 10 5G fait l’affaire et apporte une expérience relativement fluide, même si de petites latences peuvent parfois ralentir votre navigation. Je vous rassure cela n’a rien de rédhibitoire pour un smartphone vendu à ce prix-là. J’ai tout de même l’impression que le modèle 4G était un poil plus fluide. Batterie Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G embarque la même batterie de 5000 mAh que son homologue 4G. Mais ont-ils pour autant la même endurance ? Non. Cette version 5G peut tenir jusqu’à une journée et demie avec une utilisation mixte contenus vidéo, appels, musiques, Internet, applications de messagerie, lorsque le Redmi Note 10 4G grimpait jusqu’à deux journées. Deux raisons peuvent venir expliquer cette différence le taux de 90 Hz plus gourmand en énergie et la présence d’un processeur potentiellement plus énergivore. La dalle LCD pourrait aussi jouer un mini-rôle, dans le sens où un écran OLED éteint des pixels pour afficher du noir, ce qui consomme là aussi un tout petit peu moins d’énergie. Source Frandroid Recharge Du côté de la recharge, le Xiaomi Redmi Note 5G perd là aussi en puissance il faut compter sur un bloc de 18 W, contre du 33 W sur la déclinaison 4G. Conclusion la batterie met forcément plus de temps à se recharger à 100 %. C’est une fois de plus dommage. Voici les données relevées lors de notre session 6 à 30 % 22 minutes 6 à 50 % 42 minutes 6 à 80 % 1h10 6 à 100 % 2h Réseau et communication Il ne faut pas être un devin pour savoir que le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G… est compatible avec la 5G. Nous avons suffisamment employé le nom de modèle complet pour l’assimiler. En matière de bandes de fréquences françaises, ce smartphone s’appuie sur les infrastructures de la 4G en exploitant les bandes n1 2100 MHz, n3 1800 MHz, n7 2600 MHz, n20 800 MHz et n28 700 MHz, que l’on utilise pour la 5G. Le Redmi Note 10 5G va plus loin, puisqu’il prend aussi en charge la bande dédiée à la 5G sub-6, la n78 3,5 GHz. Il ne vous reste plus qu’à trouver le bon forfait. Vous pouvez compter sur du Wi-Fi 5 et du Bluetooth et, surprise, sur une puce NFC pour les titres de transport dématérialisés et le paiement sans contact. C’est un point important puisque le Redmi Note 10 4G n’y avait pas droit. Source Frandroid Du côté des appels téléphoniques, l’appareil mobile parvient à bien gommer les nuisances sonores au sein d’un environnement bruyant circulation, par exemple, au détriment néanmoins de votre voix qui se retrouve compressée. Sans pour autant être inaudible. Votre interlocuteur décèle également les bruits de klaxon et l’effet du vent. Les micros ont enfin du mal à se couper entièrement lorsque vous vous arrêtez de parler, chose que le Redmi Note 10 exécutait sans encombre. Pour la géolocalisation, je n’ai rencontré aucun problème particulier pour que Google Maps me situe au bon endroit sur la carte et m’indique le bon sens de direction à suivre. Prix et disponibilité Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G est disponible sur le site officiel de la marque au prix de 229,90 euros en configuration 4 + 64 Go, ou 269,90 euros en configuration 4 + 128 Go. Quatre coloris sont proposés Argent chromé, Bleu nuit, Gris graphite et Vert aurore.
Partagezfacilement les photos prises depuis votre Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G avec vos proches via Bluetooth ou via MMS. Précédent 1 sur 19 Suivant Selon les mises à jour, l’image est parfois un peu différente de celle qui s’affiche sur votre appareil Ce mode d’emploi vous a été utile ? Forfait mobile Forfait sans engagement B&You
Golden boy. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a lot of equipment. The Snapdragon 695 5G confers decent performance on the the and its 120 Hz AMOLED display manages over 1000 nits of brightness. Not to mention the 108 MP camera and 67-watt fast charging. Our review reveals whether the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has the potential to become a mid-range champion. Xiaomi's Redmi series enjoys widespread popularity because it offers entry-level and mid-range smartphones with a good price-performance ratio. Features such as an AMOLED screen and 120 Hz refresh rate are not uncommon. Both are available in our review candidate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. At around US$ 300 depending on the exact configuration, the device costs just as much as last year's Redmi Note 10 Pro, but still has a few improvements. These include the faster SoC, 5G, and a higher charging speed. Find out in this review whether the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G lives up to its intended role as a decent inch 209, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage128 GB UFS Flash, 128 GB , 97 GB freeConnections1 USB USB-C Power Delivery PD, Audio Connections mm headset jack, Card Reader microSD up to 1 TB exFAT supported, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, a/b/g/n/ac a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 2G 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz, 3G Bands 1/2/4/5/8/19, 4G Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/66, 5G Bands 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78, Head SAR W/kg, Body SAR W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth in mm x x = x x 3 inBattery5000 mAh Lithium-PolymerChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 11CameraPrimary Camera 108 MPix f/ 1/ + 8MP ultra wide camera f/ FOV 118° + 2MP macro camera f/ videos up to [email protected]Secondary Camera 16 MPix f/ featuresSpeakers dual speakers, Keyboard virtual, 67W charger, USB cable type A/C, SIM eject tool, Protective case, Quick start guide, Warranty card, MIUI 13, 24 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight202 g = oz / pounds, Power Supply 99 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Possible Competitors in Comparison Case - Angular glass case with wave opticsXiaomi offers the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in the case colors Graphite Gray black, Polar White white and Atlantic Blue blue. The glass back cover is barely susceptible to fingerprints, while the blue color variant dazzles with its chic light effects. Depending on the viewing angle, the reflections look like water movements, which is particularly noticeable in bright ambient light. The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G, for example, offers similar color effects on its back cover. The camera module, including the 108 MP main camera, protrudes almost 4 millimeters from the backcover, causing the smartphone to wobble back and forth quite a bit on the table. Even the included protective cover cannot completely prevent this. The AMOLED screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 5, and a protective film is attached to the screen ex factory. At a height of millimeters, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is just as slim as the Redmi Note 10 Pro, but uses a much flatter and more angular design, ensuring a secure grip when held. At 202 grams, however, the smartphone is not exactly light. The frame of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is made of plastic and, together with the glass back and AMOLED panel, forms a solid unit that feels high-quality all around. The same applies to the buttons, including the power button with its integrated fingerprint sensor, which sit firmly in the frame. Thanks to IP53 certification, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is dust- and water resistant, but should not go for a swim. Size Comparison OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G realme 9 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Motorola Moto G82 5G Samsung Galaxy A53 ❌ mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 195 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 191 mm / inch mm / 3 inch mm / inch 202 lbs164 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 193 mm / inch mm / inch 8 mm / inch 173 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 189 lbs Equipment - Two storage variantsXiaomi offers the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in two storage variants. The smaller variant houses 6 GB LPDDR4X RAM and 128 GB UFS storage, and the larger variant 8/128 GB. Around 97 GB was still available on our review device upon delivery. The internal storage can be expanded via microSD card, which can be up to 1 TB in size. The OTG-enabled USB port of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G runs at USB speed. One of the two speakers the second one on the top and the SIM slot are also located on the bottom. Either two nano-SIM cards or one nano-SIM card and a microSD card can be inserted. In addition to NFC and Bluetooth each configuration also includes a mm headphone jack, an infrared transmitter, and a fingerprint sensor in the power button. An Always On function is also included. However, the display is not permanently active, but only shows information such as time and battery status for 10 seconds after tapping the screen. microSD Card ReaderThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieves decent microSD transfer rates with our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card. In sequential reading and writing, they fall within a normal range with an average of 78 MB/s and 32 MB/s, respectively. However, the microSD reader does not perform so well in the JPG copy test, where only a meager 12 MB/s is Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test av. of 3 runsOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash Angelbird V60 MB/s ∼100% +138%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash Angelbird V60 MB/s ∼95% +127%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash Angelbird V60 MB/s ∼91% +117%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 MB/s ∼46% +10%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash MB/s ∼42% Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash Angelbird V60 MB/s ∼38% -10%Cross Platform Disk Test CPDT 0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip; SDCard Sequential Write GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60 ; SDCard Sequential Read GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60 Software - Just Android 11 for the Xiaomi smartphoneThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G runs Android 11 and Xiaomi's MIUI user interface, which has since been updated to version 13. At the time of review mid-August, the Android security patches were from July 1 and thus quite up to date. Preinstalled third-party apps such as Facebook, Tiktok and Spotify can all be deleted. Thanks to the support of DRM Widevine L1, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is also able to play streams in HD quality. Communications & GNSS - 5G, WiFi 5 & good GPSThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports all 4G and 5G frequencies that are important for Europe, so there should hardly be any reception problems in the EU region. Regarding WLAN, the Xiaomi smartphone uses WiFi 5 to establish connections with nearby routers. In tandem with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieves WLAN transfer rates of around 350 MBit/s on average in both the send and receive directions, which is completely acceptable for this price range. Data transfers are also very iperf3 receive AXE11000Average of class Smartphone - 1736, n=77, last 2 years 612 MBit/s ∼100% +77%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 352 339min - 360max MBit/s ∼58% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 346 334min - 353max MBit/s ∼57% Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 345 328min - 351max MBit/s ∼56% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 342 321min - 351max MBit/s ∼56% -1%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 341 330min - 352max MBit/s ∼56% -1% iperf3 transmit AXE11000Average of class Smartphone - 1710, n=78, last 2 years 641 MBit/s ∼100% +81%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 364 349min - 382max MBit/s ∼57% +3%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 363 354min - 376max MBit/s ∼57% +3%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 362 329min - 376max MBit/s ∼56% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 354 180min - 373max MBit/s ∼55% Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 269 255min - 281max MBit/s ∼42% -24% iperf3 receive AX12Average of class Smartphone - 1348, n=190, last 2 years 465 MBit/s ∼100% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 331 158min - 339max MBit/s ∼71% iperf3 transmit AX12Average of class Smartphone - 1395, n=189, last 2 years 484 MBit/s ∼100% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 283 148min - 297max MBit/s ∼58% 020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf Ø345 334-353 ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf Ø348 180-373 The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G pinpoints its own location with the help of satellite navigation systems such as GPS L1, Glonass L1, Galileo E1 and Beidou B1. This works accurately up to 3 meters both indoors and outdoors under testing and only takes a few seconds each. As our bike ride shows, the Xiaomi phone also provides accurate localization data in real-world conditions. The smartphone performs almost as well as the Garmin Venu2 fitness watch, which was used for direct comparison. It occasionally makes one or two small detours in the route, but the overall accuracy is completely sufficient for navigation & Voice QualityThe voice quality of the Xiaomi smartphone is very good. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G reproduces voices very clearly even in hands-free mode, and the noise suppression still works reliably even in loud environments. There was no background noise or any other abnormalities during our test calls to 4G and 5G networks. The radiation values of W/kg head SAR and SAR W/kg body SAR are comparatively low. Xiaomi's smartphone can either accommodate two nano-SIM cards or one nano-SIM card and one microSD card. VoLTE and WLAN calling are - 108 MP camera with Samsung HM2Photo with the selfie cameraThe camera setup of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is largely the same as that of the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The 108 MP main camera f/ is still based on the Samsung HM2, which takes 12 MP photos using 9-in-1 pixel binning. There is also a 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera with a 118° field of view f/ and a 16 MP selfie camera f/ The latter delivers good image quality and takes coherent portrait shots. Xiaomi has removed the 5 MP macro camera and the 2 MP depth sensor of the Redmi Note 10 Pro from our review sample. Instead of 4 cameras, there are only three in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G The aforementioned main and ultra-wide-angle cameras are joined by a 2 MP macro camera f/ Photos taken with the main camera in optimal lighting conditions look really good. The pictures are pleasing thanks to natural-looking colors, high image sharpness and a good dynamic range. The camera software can still get a lot out of the subjects in weaker ambient light. However, night shots are not the camera's forte. The setup with the NotebookCheck mascot is dark and blurry. Despite its pixel reserves, it also has a hard time with zoom shots. In the test photo, image details blur into a pixel mush at 5x magnification. The 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera does a decent job. However, you have to get used to the rather gaudy colors and a sharpness that clearly decreases towards the edges of the photo. Videos with the main, ultra-wide-angle and selfie cameras are electronically stabilized, but are limited to Full HD quality and 30 FPS. This is due to the SoC, because the Snapdragon 695 5G, unlike the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, does not support 4K videos, which were still possible in the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Image ComparisonChoose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test shot 1Daylight shot 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light shotclick to load images We took another close look at the 108 MP camera under controlled lighting conditions. In optimal lighting conditions, the camera reproduces the colors of the ColorChecker reference card very accurately, apart from certain green and brown tones, and also reproduces the test chart sharply. However, nothing can be seen at 1 lux residual light. E12 E10 E5 E8 EColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G E min - max E36 E65 E14 EColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G E min - max EAccessories & Warranty - Protective case and 67 watt power adapterThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G comes with a 67-watt power adapter, a USB cable type A to C, a SIM tool, a protective case, and a quick-start guide. The manufacturer does not offer special accessories for its smartphone in its online store. A 24-month warranty is provided for the smartphone in Germany. This may differ from region to region, so be sure to check with your supplier before purchasing. Input Devices & Operation - Responsive 120 Hz displayThanks to its refresh rate of 120 Hz, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can be used smoothly and responds very accurately to inputs. However, the high refresh rate has to be enabled in the display settings first, since the default setting is 60 HZ. The fingerprint sensor of Xiaomi's phone is located in the power button and can easily be reached with the thumb of the right hand and the index and middle fingers of the left hand. Fingerprint unlocking works reliably and very quickly, for the home screen is displayed without any significant delay. Authentication via face recognition delivers a similarly high hit rate and speed as the fingerprint sensor. However, Face Unlock is less secure as a pure software solution and also needs sufficient ambient light to work flawlessly. Display - AMOLED panel up to 1000 nitsSubpixel gridThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a 120 Hz fast AMOLED display. At 2400x1080 FHD+, it offers the same resolution as the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Because the form factor has not changed either, the pixel density remains at 395 PPI, which guarantees a sharp display. You would need a magnifying glass to look for differences in the image parameters. In principle, this is not a disadvantage since the Redmi Note 10 Pro had already made a very good impression with its display under testing. Against a white background, the AMOLED panel of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shines at an average of 686 cd/m². If you repeat the test in a smaller display area APL18 measurement, the brightness even increases up to 1073 cd/m². Without the brightness sensor, a maximum of 433 cd/m² is possible. The screen still shines at cd/m² in the lowest brightness setting. The AMOLED panel controls its brightness via pulse width modulation. At a screen brightness of 54 percent or lower, the PWM flickering moves in a quite high frequency range of to Hz. At screen brightness levels higher than 54 percent, this is a constant 120 Hz. However, fluctuations in the amplitude course are much lower in this range > 54%, so sensitive users should not be bothered by the PWM flickering. 682cd/m²671cd/m²693cd/m²683cd/m²675cd/m²694cd/m²687cd/m²687cd/m²703cd/m² Distribution of brightnessX-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum 703 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 95 %Center on Battery 675 cd/m²Contrast ∞1 Black 0 cd/m²ΔE Color Greyscale sRGB Calman 2DGamma Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAMOLED, 2400x1080, Redmi Note 10 ProOLED, 2400x1080, Moto G82 5GOLED, 2400x1080, Nord CE 2 Lite 5GIPS, 2412x1080, 9 5GIPS, 2412x1080, Galaxy A53AMOLED, 2400x1080, middle675653 -3%635 -6%590 -13%589 -13%718 6%Brightness686651 -5%640 -7%561 -18%561 -18%730 6%Brightness Distribution9598 3%96 1%92 -3%90 -5%92 -3%Black Level * dE 2000 * 8% -128% -296% -233% -25%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 26% -96% -165% -115% -8%Greyscale dE 2000 * -6% -182% -318% -247%2 -18% 102% 98% 99% 103% 107% 102%CCT6591 99%6426 101%6970 93%8540 76%8021 81%6545 99%Contrast15531178* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM detected HzThe display backlight flickers at Hz Likely utilizing PWM . The frequency of Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any comparison 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19906 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Series of measurements at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settingsIn the display settings, you can choose from three presets, namely "Vivid", "Saturated" and "Standard", for the color scheme. In addition, color temperature can be adjusted. The Xiaomi phone delivers the best display under the "Standard" setting. Colors and gray levels are then very close to the reference colors and the other image parameters are also exemplary. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 0 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 1 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices ms. Owing to its high luminosity, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is suitable for outdoor use without major restrictions. Display content can be read flawlessly if direct sunlight is avoided. This is also possible from extreme angles without any problems thanks to the AMOLED panel's high viewing-angle anglesPerformance - The Snapdragon 695 5G ensures solid performanceThe Snapdragon 695 5G and its Adreno 619 graphics chip enable solid everyday performance in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Occasionally you have to put up with small delays, but the overall operation is smooth. The power provided by the SoC is also sufficient for current games. In terms of system performance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is no different to other comparison devices equipped with the Snapdragon 695 5G. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro with its Snapdragon 732G is not far behind. Geekbench Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 740 Points ∼100% +8%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 692 Points ∼94% +1%Average of class Smartphone 58 - 1755, n=266, last 2 years 692 Points ∼94% +1%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 687 Points ∼93% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 684 Points ∼92% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 659 - 697, n=9 682 Points ∼92% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 671 Points ∼91% -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 563 Points ∼76% -18% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone 248 - 4914, n=266, last 2 years 2241 Points ∼100% +17%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1998 Points ∼89% +4%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1946 Points ∼87% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1921 Points ∼86% realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 1914 Points ∼85% 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1663 - 2038, n=9 1909 Points ∼85% -1%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 1878 Points ∼84% -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 1728 Points ∼77% -10%Antutu v9 - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone 111952 - 1119358, n=129, last 2 years 556482 Points ∼100% +40%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 409976 Points ∼74% +3%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 409358 Points ∼74% +3%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 399726 Points ∼72% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 398622 Points ∼72% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 379222 - 409358, n=6 391734 Points ∼70% -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 352259 Points ∼63% -12%PCMark for Android - Work Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 11470 Points ∼100% +10%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 10396 Points ∼91% Average of class Smartphone 4436 - 18567, n=176, last 2 years 10243 Points ∼89% -1%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 9776 Points ∼85% -6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 7569 - 10834, n=8 9492 Points ∼83% -9%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 9363 Points ∼82% -10%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 7843 Points ∼68% -25%CrossMark - OverallAverage of class Smartphone 226 - 1169, n=69, last 2 years 734 Points ∼100% +23%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 599 Points ∼82% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 593 Points ∼81% -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 552 - 604, n=6 584 Points ∼80% -3%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 579 Points ∼79% -3%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 552 Points ∼75% -8%BaseMark OS II OverallAverage of class Smartphone 1223 - 8753, n=173, last 2 years 4396 Points ∼100% +21%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 3705 Points ∼84% +2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 3535 - 3848, n=7 3683 Points ∼84% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 3638 Points ∼83% Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 3626 Points ∼82% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 3596 Points ∼82% -1%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 3535 Points ∼80% -3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 3365 Points ∼77% -8% SystemMotorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 7986 Points ∼100% +2%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 7976 Points ∼100% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 7836 Points ∼98% Average of class Smartphone 2083 - 19657, n=173, last 2 years 7780 Points ∼97% -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 6969 - 8059, n=7 7767 Points ∼97% -1%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 7157 Points ∼90% -9%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 6969 Points ∼87% -11%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 5972 Points ∼75% -24% MemoryAverage of class Smartphone 670 - 9044, n=173, last 2 years 5026 Points ∼100% +20%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4836 Points ∼96% +16%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 4092 - 4836, n=7 4438 Points ∼88% +6%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 4366 Points ∼87% +4%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4311 Points ∼86% +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4183 Points ∼83% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 4043 Points ∼80% -3%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 3855 Points ∼77% -8% GraphicsAverage of class Smartphone 697 - 26660, n=173, last 2 years 7922 Points ∼100% +79%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 5178 Points ∼65% +17%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4426 Points ∼56% Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4423 Points ∼56% 0%realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 4413 Points ∼56% 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 4295 - 4426, n=7 4372 Points ∼55% -1%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4323 Points ∼55% -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 4086 Points ∼52% -8% WebAverage of class Smartphone 718 - 2392, n=173, last 2 years 1395 Points ∼100% +16%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 1228 Points ∼88% +2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1103 - 1334, n=7 1218 Points ∼87% +1%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 1210 Points ∼87% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1207 Points ∼87% realme 9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096 1163 Points ∼83% -4%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1125 Points ∼81% -7%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 1103 Points ∼79% -9%AImark - Score of class Smartphone 4293 - 286905, n=148, last 2 years 55517 Points ∼100% +973%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 5265 Points ∼9% +2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 4924 - 5839, n=7 5221 Points ∼9% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 5172 Points ∼9% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144 4958 Points ∼9% -4%Motorola Moto G82 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144 4924 Points ∼9% -5%Samsung Galaxy A53Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144 4714 Points ∼8% -9%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 621 Points ∼100% +77%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 354 Points ∼57% +1%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 352 Points ∼57% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 351 Points ∼57% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 351 Points ∼57% 0%3DMark / Wild Life ExtremeSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 636 Points ∼100% +76%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 363 Points ∼57% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 361 Points ∼57% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 360 Points ∼57% 0%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 356 Points ∼56% -1%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited ScoreSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2275 Points ∼100% +89%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1205 Points ∼53% Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1204 Points ∼53% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1201 Points ∼53% 0%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 1197 Points ∼53% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1124 Points ∼49% -7%3DMark / Wild Life ScoreSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2293 Points ∼100% +89%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1211 Points ∼53% Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1209 Points ∼53% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1206 Points ∼53% 0%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 1197 Points ∼52% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 1143 Points ∼50% -6%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme Vulkan Unlimited PhysicsMotorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2898 Points ∼100% +8%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 2883 Points ∼99% +8%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2822 Points ∼97% +5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2773 Points ∼96% +4%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2689 Points ∼93% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2676 Points ∼92% 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme Vulkan Unlimited GraphicsSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3902 Points ∼100% +43%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 2749 Points ∼70% +1%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2736 Points ∼70% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2721 Points ∼70% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2710 Points ∼69% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2562 Points ∼66% -6%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme Vulkan UnlimitedSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3546 Points ∼100% +31%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 2778 Points ∼78% +2%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2770 Points ∼78% +2%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2734 Points ∼77% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2711 Points ∼76% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2610 Points ∼74% -4%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited PhysicsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3613 Points ∼100% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3561 Points ∼99% -1%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3529 Points ∼98% -2%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 3462 Points ∼96% -4%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3311 Points ∼92% -8%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3097 Points ∼86% -14%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited GraphicsSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3982 Points ∼100% +33%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 3008 Points ∼76% +1%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3001 Points ∼75% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2988 Points ∼75% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2973 Points ∼75% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2832 Points ∼71% -5%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES UnlimitedSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3746 Points ∼100% +21%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3107 Points ∼83% Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3104 Points ∼83% 0%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 3098 Points ∼83% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3086 Points ∼82% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2938 Points ∼78% -5%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES PhysicsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3455 Points ∼100% Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3415 Points ∼99% -1%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3411 Points ∼99% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3375 Points ∼98% -2%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2261 Points ∼65% -35%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES GraphicsSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 5172 Points ∼100% +19%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4414 Points ∼85% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4360 Points ∼84% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4346 Points ∼84% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4232 Points ∼82% -3%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4156 Points ∼100% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4120 Points ∼99% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4096 Points ∼99% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4021 Points ∼97% -2%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 4021 Points ∼97% -2%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3621 Points ∼100% +23%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2959 Points ∼82% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2955 Points ∼82% realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 2949 Points ∼81% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2917 Points ∼81% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2783 Points ∼77% -6%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES GraphicsSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 3939 Points ∼100% +40%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2837 Points ∼72% +1%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 2831 Points ∼72% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2819 Points ∼72% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2809 Points ∼71% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 2694 Points ∼68% -4%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme ES PhysicsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3554 Points ∼100% Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3481 Points ∼98% -2%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 3455 Points ∼97% -3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3372 Points ∼95% -5%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3370 Points ∼95% -5%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2823 Points ∼79% -21%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES UnlimitedSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 4645 Points ∼100% +10%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4286 Points ∼92% +2%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4234 Points ∼91% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4215 Points ∼91% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3887 Points ∼84% -8%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES Unlimited GraphicsSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 5510 Points ∼100% +22%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4573 Points ∼83% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4523 Points ∼82% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4496 Points ∼82% -1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 4038 Points ∼73% -11%3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES Unlimited PhysicsOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3517 Points ∼100% +3%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3515 Points ∼100% +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3403 Points ∼97% Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 3372 Points ∼96% -1%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 2997 Points ∼85% -12%GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark / T-Rex OnscreenXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 81 fps ∼100% 0%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 81 fps ∼100% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 81 fps ∼100% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 60 fps ∼74% -26%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 60 fps ∼74% -26%GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark / T-Rex OffscreenMotorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 95 fps ∼100% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 94 fps ∼99% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 93 fps ∼98% -1%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 92 fps ∼97% -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 91 fps ∼96% -3%GFXBench / Manhattan Onscreen OGLSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 56 fps ∼100% +33%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 43 fps ∼77% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 42 fps ∼75% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 42 fps ∼75% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 40 fps ∼71% -5%GFXBench / 1080p Manhattan OffscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 61 fps ∼100% +30%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 48 fps ∼79% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 47 fps ∼77% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 47 fps ∼77% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 45 fps ∼74% -4%GFXBench / Manhattan ES OnscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 35 fps ∼100% +17%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 30 fps ∼86% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 30 fps ∼86% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 30 fps ∼86% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 29 fps ∼83% -3%GFXBench / Manhattan ES OffscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 38 fps ∼100% +12%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 35 fps ∼92% +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 34 fps ∼89% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 34 fps ∼89% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 33 fps ∼87% -3%GFXBench / Car Chase OnscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 20 fps ∼100% +18%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 17 fps ∼85% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 17 fps ∼85% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 17 fps ∼85% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 17 fps ∼85% 0%GFXBench / Car Chase OffscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 23 fps ∼100% +21%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 20 fps ∼87% +5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% 0%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 15 fps ∼100% +25%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 12 fps ∼80% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 12 fps ∼80% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 12 fps ∼80% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 12 fps ∼80% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 11 fps ∼73% -8%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 10 fps ∼100% +22%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash fps ∼82% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash fps ∼81% -1%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash fps ∼78% -5%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash fps ∼78% -5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash fps ∼74% -10%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 23 fps ∼100% +21%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 19 fps ∼83% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 18 fps ∼78% -5%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenSamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash 26 fps ∼100% +18%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 22 fps ∼85% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 22 fps ∼85% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash 21 fps ∼81% -5%realme 9 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS Flash 21 fps ∼81% -5%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash 21 fps ∼81% -5%The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G performs well in terms of browser performance. Websites load quickly and are displayed 2 - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone - n=174, last 2 years Points ∼100% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Mi Browser Points ∼98% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Chrome Points ∼98% 0%Samsung Galaxy A53 Chrome 101 Points ∼97% -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G - n=7 Points ∼88% -10%Motorola Moto G82 5G Chrome 102 Points ∼86% -12%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Chrome98 Points ∼76% -23%Speedometer - ResultAverage of class Smartphone - 244, n=162, last 2 years runs/min ∼100% +64%Samsung Galaxy A53 Chome 101 runs/min ∼81% +32%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Chrome runs/min ∼74% +22%Motorola Moto G82 5G Chome 102 runs/min ∼71% +16%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Chrome98 runs/min ∼68% +12%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G - n=6 runs/min ∼68% +11%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Mi Browser runs/min ∼61% WebXPRT 3 - -Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Mi Browser 100 Points ∼100% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Chrome 96 Points ∼96% -4%Average of class Smartphone 22 - 265, n=181, last 2 years Points ∼96% -4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 75 - 112, n=6 Points ∼94% -6%Motorola Moto G82 5G Chrome 102 75 Points ∼75% -25%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Chrome98 71 Points ∼71% -29%Samsung Galaxy A53 Chrome 101 69 Points ∼69% -31%Octane V2 - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone 3526 - 65969, n=188, last 2 years 24776 Points ∼100% +16%Samsung Galaxy A53 Chrome 101 24159 Points ∼98% +14%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Chrome 22285 Points ∼90% +5%Motorola Moto G82 5G Chrome 102 21468 Points ∼87% +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Mi Browser 21269 Points ∼86% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 17849 - 22938, n=6 21185 Points ∼86% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Chrome98 17293 Points ∼70% -19%Mozilla Kraken - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone 414 - 14832, n=186, last 2 years 2867 ms * ∼100% -42%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Chrome98 2832 ms * ∼99% -41%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1923 - 2501, n=6 2068 ms * ∼72% -3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Mi Browser ms * ∼70% Motorola Moto G82 5G Chrome 102 ms * ∼70% -0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Chrome ms * ∼67% +5%Samsung Galaxy A53 Chrome 101 ms * ∼67% +5%* ... smaller is betterThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has better storage performance values than Xiaomi's Redmi Note 10 Pro, although both smartphones have nominally the same storage type in the form of UFS But this is hardly noticeable in everyday use because both are virtually equally fast when loading apps. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G gets its nominal advantage mostly from its higher sequential write Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProMotorola Moto G82 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5Grealme 9 5GSamsung Galaxy A53Average 128 GB UFS FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-28%-13%-10%-46%5%-2%14% Sequential Read 256KB523512 -2% -9% -3%511 -2% -2%689 ?303 - 999, n=2832%946 ? - 2037, n=257, last 2 years81% Sequential Write -45% -9% -1% -75% 0%459 ? - 857, n=28-6%504 ? - 1485, n=257, last 2 years3% Random Read -28% -12% -12% -57% 13% ? - 253, n=28-19% ? - 345, n=257, last 2 years-16% Random Write -35% -21% -25% -51% 7% ? - 213, n=28-16% ? - 475, n=258, last 2 years-14%Games - 120 fps remains the exceptionThe Xiaomi smartphone is able to demonstrate the strengths of its 120 Hz screen in gaming. However, only a few games are able to utilitze the full 120 fps, since even graphically simpler titles like Armajet cannot achieve more than 80 fps on average. The Snapdragon 695 5G also provides enough power to display PUBG Mobile at a stable 30 fps in HD/high settings. Gaming frame rates were determined with our Gamebench tool. 0102030405060708090100Tooltip; Armajet; 55-104 ; PUBG Mobile; 27-31 Emissions - Maximum power always on handTemperatureThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G remains cool during use. The maximum surface temperature only reaches °C after one hour of stress tests. As the 3DMark Wild Life benchmarks show, the Snapdragon 695 5G is always able to output maximum performance even under permanent load. °C93 °C92 °C87 F 34 °C93 °C91 F31 °C88 F °C93 °C93 °C87 F Maximum °C = 93 FAverage °C = 91 F °C87 °C90 °C91 °C86 °C87 °C92 °C87 °C89 °C91 F Maximum °C = 92 FAverage °C = 89 F Power Supply max. °C = 82 F Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F Fluke t3000FC calibrated & Voltcraft IR-260± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 91 F, compared to the average of °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.+ The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 93 F, compared to the average of °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to °C for the class Smartphone.+ The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 92 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of °C / 91 F. 3DMark Wild Life Stress Test3DMark Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAdreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%Motorola Moto G82 5GAdreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼100% 0%Samsung Galaxy A53Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash % ∼98% -2% 012345678910111213TooltipXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; SpeakersThe Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has good-sounding stereo speakers that can play relatively loud at dBA. Mids and highs are very well-balanced, whereas low tones are almost completely absent. However, the audio connection does not sound particularly clear or distortionless - the signal-to-noise ratio is only a weak dBFS. Headsets and speakers can be paired with the smartphone via the mm jack or Bluetooth The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports common Bluetooth codecs such as AAC, SBC, LDAC, aptX and aptX HD. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper 13median rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz± higher mids - on average higher than median+ mids are linear 5% delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz± higher highs - on average higher than median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%Compared to all devices tested» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%Compared to all devices tested» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Battery Life - Fast charge in 51 minutesPower ConsumptionThe power consumption of the Xiaomi phone is inconspicuous. It is more energy-efficient than most comparison devices at just under watts under load. The 5000 mAh battery can be quickly recharged via the included 67-watt power adapter. We recorded 51 minutes for a full recharge of the smartphone battery from 0 to 100%. After 21 minutes, the battery reaches 50% and after 35 minutes 80%.Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G5000 mAhXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro5020 mAhMotorola Moto G82 5G5000 mAhOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A535000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-8%14%27%-13%10%-9%Idle Minimum * -9% 6% 17% 6% ? - n=615% ? - n=195, last 2 years8%Idle Average * 22% 48%1 57% 44% ?1 - n=626% ? - n=195, last 2 years29%Idle Maximum * 21% 40% 40% 32% ? - n=621% ? - n=195, last 2 years21%Load Average * -46% -15% 17% -98% ? - n=6-10% ? - n=195, last 2 years-53%Load Maximum * -29% -7% 6% -50% ? - n=6-2% ? - n=195, last 2 years-49%* ... smaller is betterPower Consumption Geekbench 150 cd/m² Power Consumption GFXBench 150 cd/m² Battery LifeLow energy consumption and a 5000 mAh battery help the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieve good battery runtimes. Xiaomi's simulated web browsing lasts for around 13 hours and video playback for around 17 hours. We measured the times with the 120 Hz display enabled. Switching to 60 Hz should certainly allow for a few more Runtime Idle without WLAN, min brightness 39h 26min WiFi Websurfing Chrome 13h 08min Big Buck Bunny 1080p 17h 10min Load maximum brightness 6h 55min Pros+ bright AMOLED panel with 120 Hz + high-quality workmanship + features NFC, mm jack, microSD + good fingerprint sensor + good camera + stereo speakers + long battery runtimes and fast chargingCons- quite heavy at 202 grams - no full-fledged Always On display - only Android 11 - maximum video resolution of 1080pVerdict on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi has launched a very strong mid-range smartphone in the form of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. One of the biggest plus points of the incher is its high-contrast and color-matched AMOLED panel with peak brightness of over 1000 nits. The refresh rate of 120 Hz makes handling nice and smooth. The remaining equipment is also impressive. In addition to 5G mobile communication and NFC, there is a mm jack and a microSD slot. The 108 MP camera takes good pictures in daylight, the runtimes are decent, and one full charge takes less than 1 hour thanks to the 67-watt power adapter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a very well-equipped mid-range smartphone at a comparatively low buyers of the Redmi Note 11 Pro have to accept that it only runs Android 11. But Android 12 might be available via a later update. We also hope that Xiaomi will improve the Always On functionality, since it is currently only limited to a few seconds. In the current Redmi Note 11 lineup, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G ranks behind the top model Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. As both offer almost the same features despite significantly different prices the Pro+ costs around US$ 70 more, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G may well be the most exciting smartphone from the Redmi Note 11 series for many buyers. Alternatives to the Xiaomi smartphone are, for example, the Motorola Moto G82 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A53, both of which also offer a 120 Hz AMOLED and AvailabilityWhile there are a range of options to choose from - not all versions are available in all regions and not all versions have the same specs internationally. For example, the Note 11 Pro+ 5G in India is the same as the Note 11 Pro 5G and is available both as 6 GB/128 GB and 8 GB/256 GB in all colors via Amazon. In the UK, three variants in the 6 GB/256 GB configuration appear to be available via Amazon the Note 11 Pro £ the Note 11 Pro 5G £ and the Note 11 Pro 5G + £ Amazon US also offers the smartphone in a variety of configurations. Prices are as of and are subject to change. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G - 08/18/2022 v7 Manuel Masiero Connectivity51 / 70 → 73% Games Performance33 / 64 → 51% Application Performance74 / 86 → 86% Smartphone - Weighted Average Pricecompare My fascination for computers started with the C64. Since then, I’ve put everything that comes my way in terms of hardware through its paces. From the C64 to the Amiga 500 and the first PC with an 8088 CPU, my list of projects has grown increasingly longer. For more than 20 years now I have also turned my hobby into my profession and have been active in the mobile section of Notebookcheck since 2021. Before that, I worked as a hardware editor for IDG Media and VNU Business Publications PC professional, among Jacob Fisher - Translator - 90 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Growing up in regional Australia, I first became acquainted with computers in my early teens after a broken leg from a football soccer match temporarily condemned me to a predominately indoor lifestyle. Soon afterwards I was building my own systems. Now I live in Germany, having moved here in 2014, where I study philosophy and anthropology. I am particularly fascinated by how computer technology has fundamentally and dramatically reshaped human culture, and how it continues to do share our article, every link counts! .170 Manuel Masiero, 2022-08-20 Update 2022-08-20 XiaomiRedmi Note 10 5G 6GB/128GB from Price in Kenya @KES 25999. Key features: 90Hz adaptive refresh rate, UFS2.2 storage, Hi-Res audio, 5000mAh battery power, 48MP triple main camera, FHD video recording. oTTEEy.notice xiaomi redmi note 10 5g
